Friday 15 April 2011

AT WHAT POINT DOES PUBLIC INTIMACY BECOME OFFENSIVE VULGARITY?


























The story as it has been reported, to date:
Two men were on a date in a London pub nearby to Soho when they were asked by another drinker to stop kissing. Later, when the pair were set to go, they were asked to leave by a member of staff who cited “obscene” behaviour as her reason for their ejection. Two fellow diners who were sat on a nearby table have described the men’s actions as moderate and unworthy of objection. The matter has been referred to the Metropolitan police.

The problem I have with the discussion of this news story in its current form is that second-hand information cannot really provide enough of a picture to formulate an informed opinion. There are a number of factors to which none of us are privy; but a wealth of conclusions being drawn regardless. The lack of clarity here leaves us all to mere speculation alone. At what point does public intimacy tip over from a touching display of innocent romance into offensive vulgarity? Is it right or fair to discriminate on the grounds of sexuality?

What this event shows – along with the array of comments listed online – is the subjectivity to human experience and social behaviours that everyone inherently has. It is at the crux of the very story itself – a disagreement about what is acceptable. No pub landlord, couple on their first-date, journalist or web commentator is ever going to solve the problem that people’s ideas about how to live differ.

Until we know the motivations of the pub’s landlord and staff - and the exact nature of the couple’s behaviour - we will not be able to weigh up this event with reason or clarity. In the meantime, vilifying the people involved will only do ourselves a similar disservice.

A note regarding the planned "kiss-in" protests: Deliberately riling those whom you disagree with will not achieve mutual respect but will stoke further division.

The flurry of opinions being spouted from all quarters seem to warrant a nationwide questioning: “AT WHAT POINT DOES PUBLIC INTIMACY BECOME OFFENSIVE VULGARITY?”


No comments:

Post a Comment

Topicality Is All In Journalism is the distillation of current affairs, news articles and items of cultural note into poster designs and written commentary. It has been devised to promote the level-headed and rational sentiments made by others in reaction to current happenings – be them local, national, international or universal.

The aim is to have a constant stream of visual output that draws from the range of topics being discussed in the public realm. The posters are designed to play with the conventions of advertisements and other public visual material as a means of presenting unexpected motifs within a mostly commercialised realm of printed communication output.

Visitors are actively encouraged to participate by promoting the opinions they feel an affinity with by printing copies of the posters to display in their area.

The Topicality posters will soon be available to order as digital prints and to download as high resolution digital files in a not-for-profit capacity.

This project is run in-conjunction with the National Diplomatic Rhetoric’s ongoing poster campaign to encourage public thought and debate through material that attempts at a neutral and honest communication of facts and ideas.